Direct booking Agenda:

 

Suppliers Eliminating Third-Party

and Dealing Direct with Consumers

Traditional travel agencies and franchise models are under pressure not just from technology, but from supplier strategy: cruise lines themselves are increasingly trying to reduce dependence on third-party agents and move bookings direct. This shift has a number of causes and implications for any investor or franchisee in the Expedia Cruises/travel agent space. Below are the details.

 

 

___________________________

 

 

1. Why Cruise Lines Are Pushing Direct Booking

 

Before jumping into examples, it helps to understand the motivations behind this trend. Cruise lines are pushing direct channels for several reasons:

Higher margins: Every dollar paid in commission to agents is money cruise lines could instead keep if consumers book directly.

 

  • Higher margins: Every dollar paid in commission to agents is money cruise lines could instead keep if consumers book directly.

 

  • Control over customer relationship: When bookings are direct, cruise lines have more ability to upsell directly, send promotions, gather data, enforce cancellation policies, and cross-sell excursions, insurance, etc., without intermediaries.

 

  • Data ownership: Direct bookings give the lines access to customer data (preferences, demographics, behaviors) which can be leveraged for marketing, loyalty programs, and future business. Agents often mediate or even block access.

 

  • Reduced distribution costs and fees: Maintaining relationships/networks with third-party sellers involves marketing spend, agreements, and sometimes compliance costs. Direct channels can reduce or eliminate these.

 

  • Consumer behavior alignment: Many travelers now expect to book travel online and directly, via apps or websites, and are comfortable comparing options themselves.

 

___________________________

 

 

2. Evidence & Examples from Cruise Lines

 

Here are several public statements, policy changes, or planned strategic moves by cruise lines that show the direct-booking agenda in action.

 

 

 

Cruise Line

 

What they've Announced or Done

 

Implications for Agents/3rd Party Resellers

 

Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCL / NCLH + brands Oceania, Regent)

* Expects direct bookings to overtake travel agent bookings by end of 2023. In a public investor/analyst event, CEO Frank Del Rio said agent channel is still biggest historically, but direct is growing fastest. Connecting Travel+1

 

* Introduced “no-NCFs” policy (NCFs = non-commissionable fares, which includes port fees, gratuities, etc.) for agents who booked far in advance, but later discontinued or adjusted the policy. Seatrade Cruise News

 

* Extended some agent commission programs temporarily, but then discontinued them for future bookings. Travel Agent Central+1

 

 

Signals that NCL sees direct bookings as a growing priority; putting pressure on agencies as the agency channel is now challenged not just by stream but by policy changes reducing what agents are paid. The discontinuation of no-NCF rewards means that agent incentive for early or full-fare bookings is diminishing.

Disney Cruise Line

* Cut commission rates for agents on rebookings when done onboard (i.e. when a passenger is still on the ship), lowering from ~16% to 10%. travelmarketreport.com+2Travel Agent Central+2

 

* Adjusted deposit requirements (though not a direct commission policy, this lowers barriers for direct buyers) and changed “placeholder” deposit rules. These changes can favor direct bookings. mainstmagic.com+1

 

* Agent community expressed concern, ASTA and others asked Disney to reconsider commission changes. Travel Agent Central+1

 

 

By reducing agent commission especially in the onboard-rebooking space, Disney is discouraging agents from pushing those rebookings, and encouraging consumers to think about direct options. Also, lower deposit / placeholder changes may incentivize those comfortable booking online to do so.

Royal Caribbean International (RCCL)

While RCCL has not announced full commission elimination, it has publically asserted that it will not cut commission in response to Disney’s onboard agent commission reduction. For example, after Disney’s policy, Royal Caribbean’s SVP Vicki Freed said they “absolutely will not be cutting commissions” and intend to offer incentives to agents to encourage onboard rebookings so agents can compete. travelmarketreport.com

 

 

Even when cruise lines resist, the industry environment is clearly shaped by the direct vs agent policy shifts. Agents must allocate marketing efforts, acquire customers, or compete with the increasingly favorable direct-consumer offers.

General/Industry Trends

* Many cruise lines have reduced or eliminated agent commissions on certain fares or components (e.g., NCFs: non-commissionable fares) indicating that what was once commissionable is now being carved out. Travel Agent Central+1

 

* Cruise lines increasingly push their own websites, call centers, loyalty programs, and online channels with exclusive deals to lure customers away from agents. NCL’s statements about direct web sales being the fastest growing channel are part of that. Connecting Travel+2

 

* Financial / investor disclosures emphasize controlling marketing costs, margin improvements via direct booking, and reducing intermediary commissions.

 

 

These show that the trend is systemic, not isolated. For an agent or franchisee, it implies that the baseline of what you can expect in terms of commission, exclusivity, or supplier cooperation is shifting downward.

 

___________________________

 

 

3. Recent Policy Moves & Their Consequences

 

 

  • No-NCF / NCF commission discontinuation: Norwegian Cruise Line extended commission payment for non-commissionable fares temporarily (to help agents recover post-pandemic) but then planned to discontinue the program. This reduces what agents can earn on bookings that include fees/gratuities etc. Seatrade Cruise News+1

 

  • Commission caps for onboard rebookings: Disney’s cap lowering from ~16% to 10% for rebookings made onboard is a concrete example of how a cruise line pushes down agent incentives in certain channels. disneycruiselineblog.com+1

 

  • Direct sales projections: NCLH publicly forecasting the crossover point where direct bookings will exceed agent bookings is increasingly common. When a company says that, it impacts how investors, partners, and agents see risk. Connecting Travel+1

 

 

___________________________

 

 

4. Implications for Travel Agents / Agencies / Franchise Owners

 

 

Given this trend, here’s what it means in practical terms for someone considering investing in or owning a travel agency/franchise (like Expedia Cruises):

 

  • Shrinking Commissions: Agents can expect that commission percentages, especially in auxiliary components (on-board / non-cruise revenue, optional extras, port fees etc.), will continue to drop or be carved out.

 

  • Fewer Exclusive Offers: Cruise lines will increasingly reserve the best deals for direct customers—sometimes offering exclusive promotions, loyalty perks, or bundled extras only via their websites or direct channels.

 

  • Commoditization Pressure: As customers compare direct and agent-prices side by side, and as direct channels become easier and more trusted, agents will increasingly compete based on minor differences (upsells, service, convenience), rather than price or access.

 

  • Need for Differentiation: Agents must increasingly add value beyond what consumers can do themselves—advice, curation, crisis handling, personalization, guarantees, perks. If the commission is shrinking, the value proposition must grow.

 

  • Policy Risks & Supplier Dependence: Agents are more exposed to policy changes—cruise lines changing commission structures, eliminating NCF payments, putting caps on onboard rebookings, changing propaganda, etc. For a franchisee, this makes financial forecasting riskier.

 

 

___________________________

 

 

5. Case Studies: What Travel Agent Partners Report

 

 

  • Agents have expressed concern publicly when cruise lines reduce or cap commissions. For example, ASTA (American Society of Travel Agents) has repeatedly asked Disney to reconsider when DCL reduced onboard rebooking commissions. TravelDailyNews International+1

 

  • Norwegian’s no-NCF program had good uptake (≈2,500 agencies agreed) but was later discontinued for new bookings, signaling that even well-received incentive programs may be transient and not relied upon as permanent solutions. Travel Agent Central+1

 

  • Travel executives at Norwegian have admitted booking levels via agents have dropped relative to direct, which shifts margin and revenue growth toward direct channels. Travel Agent Central+1

 

___________________________

 

 

6. Forward-Looking Trends & What to Watch

 

 

To anticipate how this direct-booking agenda will unfold (and how it may affect potential franchisees), here are things to monitor:

 

 

  • Commission restructuring announcements: Watch for cruise lines publishing new commission caps, especially for onboard rebookings or ancillary revenue (excursions, specialty dining, etc.).

 

  • “Direct only” perks: Offers available only via cruise line’s website or loyalty apps (e.g. cabin upgrades, onboard credits) may be expanded.

 

  • Agency-support programs being reduced or discontinued: Things like agent marketing support, “agent-exclusive fares”, “no-NCF” programs, etc., may be rolled back or modified.

 

  • Legal / regulatory pressure: Some jurisdictions may require transparency, fairness in commissions, or pricing laws that impact how cruise lines manage commissions.

 

  • Consumer behavior: If direct bookings continue growing faster, the cruise lines will double-down on their direct channels, further deprioritizing agent channels.

 

___________________________

 

 

Conclusion: The Strategic Risk for Investors

 

Putting all this together, the “Direct Booking Agenda” constitutes one of the clearest risks to the traditional agency/franchise model. For someone investing in a brick-and-mortar cruise travel agency (like Expedia Cruises or similar), this has implications:

 

  • Eroding Revenue Streams — As more booking components become non-commissionable or see reduced commissions, revenue per booking falls.

 

  • Valuation Risk — Since much of agency value is based on recurring commissions, any policy change by a supplier (cruise line) that reduces or eliminates part of these commissions can materially reduce earnings.

 

  • Competitive Disadvantage vs Direct Channels — Direct channels often have lower customer acquisition costs (the lines themselves market directly), meaning they can offer better deals or perks, leaving agents to try to match value in other ways.

 

  • Need for Hybrid / Digital Transformation — Franchisees or agents must adapt: developing direct-to-consumer offerings, integrating AI tools, offering more added value (consulting, customer service, crisis support), possibly shifting to fee-based rather than commission-only models.

 

___________________________

___________________________