High Acquisition or

Start-up Costs

 

One of the most significant barriers to entering the travel franchise industry is the high cost of acquisition or start-up investment. Unlike other small business opportunities that offer scalability and innovation, buying into a travel franchise often involves a substantial financial outlay for a model with limited growth potential and declining margins.

 

These costs are magnified by misaligned expectations — where sellers (current franchisees) and brokers present optimistic scenarios that are increasingly inconsistent with industry realities.

 

 

___________________________

 

 

1. The High Cost of Entry

 

Travel franchises such as Expedia Cruises require:

 

  • Franchise fees: Initial payments to secure the right to operate under the brand.

 

  • Leasehold improvements: Renovations, furniture, fixtures, and technology for a storefront location.

 

  • Working capital: Funds to cover payroll, marketing, and overhead until the business turns cash-flow positive (often months or years).

 

  • Ongoing royalties and fees: A percentage of gross sales, plus contributions to centralized marketing funds, which reduce net profitability.

 

For a small business operator, this represents hundreds of thousands of dollars in initial and recurring expenses, tied to a business model increasingly at odds with consumer behavior.

 

 

___________________________

 

 

2. Unrealistic Expectations of Current Franchise Owners

 

Many current franchise owners, when looking to sell, fail to acknowledge the growing risks and diminishing profitability of their businesses:

 

  • They may have purchased their franchise years ago, when consumer reliance on agents was higher and online competition was less pronounced.

 

  • They often continue to believe that brand recognition (e.g., the Expedia name) alone ensures steady customer flow, when in reality most consumers go directly to Expedia.com, Expedia.ca or other online booking channels.

 

  • They may view their franchise as a “turnkey investment” when in practice it requires significant personal sales effort, recruiting and managing independent agents, and heavy local marketing.

 

This disconnect creates a situation where sellers overstate the opportunity while buyers inherit the growing risks of a shrinking industry segment.

 

 

___________________________

 

 

3. Broker-Driven Valuations

 

Adding to the problem is the role of business brokers, many of whom rely on aggressive valuation methods to position travel franchises as attractive opportunities:

 

  • Valuations are often based on gross sales (top-line revenue) rather than net profitability, creating an inflated sense of business value. Valuation multiples are not aligned with accepted industry methods often citing unrealistic “add-backs”.

 

  • Brokers may highlight the resilience of “travel rebound” after COVID-19, without disclosing that commissions are under pressure, direct-to-consumer sales are rising, and AI platforms are capturing market share.

 

  • Multiples applied in valuations are sometimes based on broader franchising sectors, not the unique vulnerabilities of brick-and-mortar travel agencies.

 

While brokers play a role in marketing the sale, the ultimate responsibility lies with the current franchise owner who agrees to unrealistic pricing and presents these valuations as achievable benchmarks to prospective buyers.

 

___________________________

 

 

4. The Risk of Overpaying

 

The result is that many new entrants risk overpaying for a business model already in decline. Common outcomes include:

 

  • Lower-than-expected earnings: After royalties, overhead, and agent commissions, net profit margins are often razor-thin.

 

  • Longer break-even periods: New owners may take years to recover their initial investment, if at all.

 

  • Difficulty reselling: With profitability under pressure, reselling the franchise later at a similar or higher valuation becomes increasingly difficult.

 

These risks are amplified by external factors such as:

 

  • Supplier competition (airlines, cruise lines, and hotels offering direct booking discounts).

 

  • Expedia Group’s own online dominance, which competes against its franchises.

 

  • Technological disruption from AI-driven booking platforms.

 

 

___________________________

 

 

5. Responsibility and Misalignment of Expectations

 

While brokers may inflate valuations, and while franchisors promote brand strength, the responsibility for managing expectations rests with the current franchisee:

 

  • Owners who set asking prices based on outdated business conditions contribute to a cycle of misrepresentation.

 

  • Buyers entering at inflated valuations may later experience financial distress, leading to negative perceptions of the brand and the franchise system overall.

 

  • In the end, franchisees inherit not just a business, but a set of risks that were either downplayed or ignored by the seller.

 

This misalignment between what is promised (strong profits, steady consumer demand, brand power) and what is delivered (shrinking margins, high costs, and increasing competition) is at the core of why many travel franchises struggle to attract qualified buyers.

 

 

___________________________

 

 

Conclusion: A Costly Bet in a Shrinking Market

 

High acquisition or start-up costs make travel franchises a risky and often overpriced investment. The mismatch between seller expectations, broker-driven valuations, and actual industry performance leaves buyers vulnerable to disappointing returns and diminished resale opportunities.

 

Ultimately, while brokers may facilitate the sale, it is the current franchise owner who bears responsibility for perpetuating unrealistic expectations. In an industry facing declining consumer reliance on agents, outdated storefront models, and direct competition from the franchisor itself, buyers must be cautious not to pay tomorrow’s prices for yesterday’s business model.

 

 

___________________________

___________________________